mm-1038
Subject: Re: Intersection of Zariski dense sets with
hypersurfaces
> David, assume that $D$ is a dense subset of an afÞne
irreducible
> variety $V$, and that $D$ has the property that it does not
intersect
> any hypersurface $H$ of $V$ densely:
> Then does this not imply that THERE ARE NO SUBSETS $S$ of
$D$ having
> the property that the closure of $S$ in $V$ is of
co-dimension one in
> $V$?
> This is rather striking given that
> $Dim(Cl(D))=Dim(V)$
> Where by $Cl(D)$ is meant the zariski closure of the set
$D$.
Yes, it would seem so: the dimension of the closure of a
subset of D,
for D a subset of the plane as was constucted, can be either
0 or 2
but not 1, strage as that may seem.
--
David A. Madore
(david.madore@ens.fr,
http://www.dma.ens.fr/~madore/ )
===
Subject: Re: A continuous iteration of f(x,y) r>0 ; f(x,y)^[r]
Originator: israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel)
> f:R*R->R .Let us start with a simple case:
> g(x,g(x,y))= f(x,y) f given (1)
> or f(x,y)^[1/2]=g(x,y)
> Example: f(x,y)=y/(1+x*y) , g(x,y)=2*y/(2+x*y) veriÞes (1).
> By the same way will have:f(x,y)^[1/p]=p*y/(p+x*y)=g(x,y) p
integer
> verifying g(x,g(x....)))n times =f(x,y)=y/(1+x*y).
> We may generalize:
> if f(x,y)=phi^-1(phi(y)+n(x)) or m^[n(x)](y) ,
> phi(m(y))=phi(y)+1 ;
> then f(x,y)^[r]=phi^-1(phi(y)+r.n(x)) or m^[r.n(x)](y) ,
> here r is a positive real number.
> Please your comments and ideas,alain.
Alain, my tetration.org web site is dedicated to continuous
iteration.
See http://www.tetration.org/Dynamics/index.html for
resources on
continuous iteration and
http://www.tetration.org/Combinatorics/index.html for an
outline of my
combinatorial approach to the subject.
For ideas consider Stephen Wolfram¹s question:
> How can one extend recursive function deÞnitions to
continuous
> numbers? What is the continuous analog of the Ackermann
function? The
> symbolic forms of the Ackermann function with a Þxed Þrst
argument
> seem to have obvious interpretations for arbitrary real or
complex
> values of the second argument. But is there a general way
to extend
> these kinds of recursive deÞnitions to continuous cases?
Given a way
> to do this, how does it apply to recursive deÞnitions like
those on
> page 130? What happens to all the irregularities when one
is between
> integer values? Or is it only possible to Þnd simple
continuous
> generalizations to functions that show fundamentally simple
behavior?
> Can this be used as a characterization of when the behavior
is simple?
For my non-peer-reviewed response to Wolfram¹s question on
the NKS Forum
see
http://forum.wolframscience.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=488
Here¹s why I¹m interested in the subject. A theory of
continuously
iterated smooth matrix functions would probably encompass all
of
dynamics in physics. A theory of continuously iterated smooth
complex
functions would be powerful enough to extend the Ackermann
function to
complex numbers.
Daniel Geisler
===
Subject: Message from the moderator
Originator: israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel)
As you may have noticed, sci.math.research, along with some
other
newsgroups, has been attacked by vandals again, posting
messages
===
were not approved by the moderators. There seems to be no way
to
prevent this from happening. However, depending on your news
try putting the following lines in your killÞle.
Robert Israel
moderator for sci.math.research
===
Subject: Re: Recurrence relation, part 3
Originator: israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel)
> I am sorry I wasn¹t clear enough in my previous message. The
> polynomial p(x,y) is a general polynomial, namely, p(x,y) =
a_{00} +
> a_{10}x + a_{01}y + a_{11}xy + a_{20}x^2 + a_{02}y^2 + ... +
> a_{04}y^4.
> [ Moderator¹s note.
> I was talking about the simplest expansion, namely, Taylor.
> a_{00} may be taken equal 1 if this simpliÞes things.
> -ri]
> Alex
You might write p as 1 + q(x,y), where q has no constant term.
Then the inÞnite series
1 - q + q^2 - q^3 + ...
automatically makes sense as a formal power series, where it
is
indeed the reciprocal of 1+q. It also converges absolutely
for small enough values of x and y, so it is what you need.
Of course, it¹s still a mess to sort out the terms, since
ones of degree n may occur all the way from q^{n/4} to q^n.
But this at least allows straightforward computation of as
much of the expansion as you want.
William C. Waterhouse
Penn State
===
Subject: Re: Graph Theory: A minimal subgraph problem
3QLpj-NoP*NzsIC,boYU]bQ]H¹
y<#4ga3$21:
> This is what I need to do: Given a graph with vertices V
and edges
> given by the matrix W, I need a connected subgraph (V¹,W¹)
with the
> minimal number of nodes so that from V¹ there are edges in
the
> original graph (V,W) to all the nodes of the original graph
(for
> example this means that for a fully connected graph I need
only one
> node in V¹). (The costs of these removed original edges
could also be
> minimized).
> I do not have experience with the graph theory and I do not
know where
> to search.
This is the minimum connected dominating set problem,
equivalent to the
maximum leaf spanning tree problem.
--
David Eppstein
Computer Science Dept., Univ. of California, Irvine
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/
===
Subject: Has anybody encountered the following strange object
...
Epigone-thread: dijerdnem
Originator: israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel)
Hi everybody,
has anybody seen an object like this
=c d(x-v) d(y-u)
where c is a number, d stands for the Dirac-Deltafunction, and
the <> is a functional average over the function f. Does
anyone know
a name for this? Has anyone done some work using/involving
this?
We are doing research in physics and do not know how to deal
with
this object and wonder if any of you mathematicians have
ideas.
Any help will be appreciated!
Shoshi
===
Subject: Re: Has anybody encountered the following strange
object ...
> has anybody seen an object like this
> =c d(x-v) d(y-u)
> where c is a number, d stands for the Dirac-Deltafunction,
and
> the <> is a functional average over the function f. Does
anyone know
> a name for this? Has anyone done some work using/involving
this?
> We are doing research in physics and do not know how to
deal with
> this object and wonder if any of you mathematicians have
ideas.
> Any help will be appreciated!
What is a functional average? Your formula looks like
something from
the theory of vertex algebras (or vertex Poisson algebras, as
you say
f is a function), you might look at Kac, Vertex algebras for
beginners, or Frenkel/Ben-Zvi.
--
Maarten Bergvelt
===
Subject: Re: modular elliptic curves over number Þelds?
Originator: israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel)
>> Are there examples of
>> elliptic curves over number Þelds which are known not to
be modular?
>It is strongly believed that there are elliptic curves even
over real
>quadratic Þelds that do not occur as a quotient of the
Albanese of any
>Shimura variety (see, for example, a recent paper of
Blasius).
On the other hand, for any elliptic curve over any totally
real Þeld
there should be a Hilbert modular form which gives rise to the
curve, although as Milne points out one has to be a bit
careful as
to what one means here---the standard recipe over Q, cutting
the curve
out from a Jacobian, does not generalise well in the real
quadratic case
(although as it happens the technicalities have been dealt
with in
this case by Taylor).
The problem with the question is that it is sufÞciently vague
to admit
several answers. If the questioner deÞnes precisely what
he/she means
by modular then it would be possible to give a better answer.
The
problem
is that it¹s very hard to make the question rigorous in
general!
The heart of the matter is that given a classical cuspidal
modular
eigenform
whose q-expansion has integral coefÞcients, a standard
construction of
Shimura
et al gives you an elliptic curve over Q. The big conjecture
was that
all elliptic curves arose in this way, and this was proved
recently
by Breuil, Conrad, Diamond and Taylor via a combination of a
technical
generalisation of Wiles¹ ideas and a bit of good fortune with
the
prime 3. Now change Q to a number Þeld. What should one
replace
the notion of modular form by? One could try using geometry
(Shimura
varieties), or one could try using something more analytic
(automorphic
forms). But one quickly runs into technicalities---for
example the
analogue of Shimura¹s construction modular form-->elliptic
curve
is not known even for automorphic forms for GL_2 over an
imaginary
quadratic Þeld (although again there has been progress by
Taylor
and others).
At the end of the day, one could dream, and the dream is
probably
that given any elliptic curve over any number Þeld K there
exists
a cuspidal automorphic representation of the GL_2 of the
adeles
of K such that the representations of the absolute Galois
group of K
associated to the curve and the automorphic representation
are isomorphic.
But this is more like a fantasy at the minute---the Galois
representation associated to the automorphic form has not yet
been constructed and, given that essentially the only
construction
of Galois representation that we know is via Shimura varieties
and that these don¹t seem to give enough Galois
representations,
this dream is rather a long way from being realised.
Kevin
===
Subject: Paper published by Algebraic and Geometric Topology
Originator: israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel)
The following paper has been published:
Algebraic and Geometric Topology
URL:
http://www.maths.warwick.ac.uk/agt/AGTVol4/agt-4-52.abs.html
Title:
CategoriÞcation of the Kauffman bracket skein module of
$I$-bundles over
surfaces
Author(s):
Marta M. Asaeda Jozef H. Przytycki Adam S. Sikora
Abstract:
Khovanov deÞned graded homology groups for links L in R^3 and
showed
that their polynomial Euler characteristic is the Jones
polynomial of
L. Khovanov¹s construction does not extend in a
straightforward way to
links in I-bundles M over surfaces F not D^2 (except for the
homology
with Z/2 coefÞcients only). Hence, the goal of this paper is
to
provide a nontrivial generalization of his method leading to
homology
invariants of links in M with arbitrary rings of coefÞcients.
After proving the invariance of our homology groups under
Reidemeister
moves, we show that the polynomial Euler characteristics of
our
homology groups of L determine the coefÞcients of L in the
standard
basis of the skein module of M. Therefore, our homology
groups provide
a `categoriÞcation¹ of the Kauffman bracket skein module of
M. Additionally, we prove a generalization of Viro¹s exact
sequence
for our homology groups. Finally, we show a duality theorem
relating
cohomology groups of any link L to the homology groups of the
mirror
image of L.
Secondary: 57M25, 57R56
Keywords:
Khovanov homology, categoriÞcation, skein module, Kauffman
bracket
Author(s) address(es):
Dept of Mathematics, 14 MacLean Hall
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
and
Dept of Mathematics, Old Main Bldg, The George Washington
University
1922 F St NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA
and
Dept of Mathematics, 244 Math Bldg, SUNY at Buffalo
Buffalo, NY 14260, USA, and
Inst for Adv Study, School of Math, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
Email: asaeda@math.uiowa.edu, przytyck@gwu.edu,
asikora@buffalo.edu
===
Subject: Re: Banach space Of Analytic Functions
Originator: israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel)
On 14 Dec 04 13:54:46 -0500 (EST), Ali Taghavi
In Fact I Need To Such Structure For The Following Fredholm
Index
>Interpretation for the main Object In The Hilbert 16th
Problem:
>http://www.arxiv.org/abs/math.DS/0408037
>On The Other Hand,:
>I Found The Following Thesis in
> Math Project genealogy Banach space Of Analytic Maps...
>http://genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/html/id.phtml?id=48919
>can one give me some references containing materials
simillar to above
>this (and Simillar topics) thesis
>thank you
>Ali Taghavi
>PS:What other space you suggest for action of a polynomial
Vector
>Þeld X in order to obtaining a bounded fredholm operator
which index
>is equal to the number of limit cycles of X
************************
David C. Ullrich
===
Subject: Re: Banach space Of Analytic Functions
Epigone-thread: gumÞkend
1)What Fredholm Operator Theory exist for (Complete)
TVS(Topological
Vector Space) which assert that there are only a Þnite Number
Of
Possible Index On a given connected Component of The Space Of
Fredholm
Operators (this would be an Attempt to prove a uniform Upper
Bound For
The Number Of Limit Cycles Of Polynomial Vector Field of
degree n
2)The Argument Below can not work on Schwarts maps since
exponential
maps are not schwarts maps!
Note that schwarts maps Are Invariant Under Action Of a
pollynomial
Vector Field. (Can we change the Norm of Schwarts Maps Such
That
Differentiation(and Action of Polynomial Vector Field Be A
Bounded
Operator)?
>On 14 Dec 04 13:54:46 -0500 (EST), Ali Taghavi
I Search for a Banach structure on C^inf(R^2)
>There is no norm on C^inf(R^2) which induces the standard
>topology. This is easy to see: In the standard topology on
>this space partial differentiation operators are continuous.
>But these operators cannot be bounded with respect to a norm,
>because they have unbounded spectrum (exponential functions
>are eigenvectors with large eigenvalues).
===
Subject: Re: Banach space Of Analytic Functions
>1)What Fredholm Operator Theory exist for (Complete)
TVS(Topological
>Vector Space) which assert that there are only a Þnite
Number Of
>Possible Index On a given connected Component of The Space
Of Fredholm
>Operators (this would be an Attempt to prove a uniform Upper
Bound For
>The Number Of Limit Cycles Of Polynomial Vector Field of
degree n
>2)The Argument Below can not work on Schwarts maps since
exponential
>maps are not schwarts maps!
If the Question was About Schwarz Maps then you should have
Asked About Schwarz Maps!
>Note that schwarts maps Are Invariant Under Action Of a
pollynomial
>Vector Field. (Can we change the Norm of Schwarts Maps Such
That
>Differentiation(and Action of Polynomial Vector Field Be A
Bounded
>Operator)?
What Norm are you Referring To? Assuming that Schwarts Maps
are what is commonly called Schwarz functions, ie rapidly
decreasing functions: It¹s easy to see that there is no
norm on the Schwarz space which induces the standard
topology.
Proof: Let S be the Schwarz space and S¹ the Dual, the
space of Tempered Distributions. Suppose the Topology
on S is given by a Norm. Then Partial Derivatives
are bounded on S. Since they are Essentially Self-Adjoint,
Partial Derivative Operators are Also Bounded on S¹.
But Exponentials Are Tempered Distributions. QED!
>>On 14 Dec 04 13:54:46 -0500 (EST), Ali Taghavi
>There is no norm on C^inf(R^2) which induces the standard
>>topology. This is easy to see: In the standard topology on
>>this space partial differentiation operators are continuous.
>>But these operators cannot be bounded with respect to a
norm,
>>because they have unbounded spectrum (exponential functions
>>are eigenvectors with large eigenvalues).
************************
David C. Ullrich
===
Subject: Re: Banach space Of Analytic Functions
Epigone-thread: gumÞkend
Of Course I Search for a NON STANDARD topology for some
Functional
Space(For Example schwars maps) which is invariant under the
action of
a polynomial vector Þeld X (As a Bounded operator ) Such that
the
Number of Attractores Of X can be interprated in term of
Fredholm
Index of the operator(action)
For Example I Search some reference Containing materials As
Follow:
http://genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/html/id.phtml?id=48919
which can help the idea in following:
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/math.DS/0408037
Finally,let we remove the banachness of linear space in the
deÞnition
of a fredholm operator,what consequence would appear?does
Dieudone¹s
theorem on connected component of the fredholm operators
valid?
>If the Question was About Schwarz Maps then you should have
>Asked About Schwarz Maps!
>>Note that schwarts maps Are Invariant Under Action Of a
pollynomial
>>Vector Field. (Can we change the Norm of Schwarts Maps Such
That
>>Differentiation(and Action of Polynomial Vector Field Be A
Bounded
>>Operator)?
>What Norm are you Referring To? Assuming that Schwarts Maps
>are what is commonly called Schwarz functions, ie rapidly
>decreasing functions: It¹s easy to see that there is no
>norm on the Schwarz space which induces the standard
>topology.
>Proof: Let S be the Schwarz space and S¹ the Dual, the
>space of Tempered Distributions. Suppose the Topology
>on S is given by a Norm. Then Partial Derivatives
>are bounded on S. Since they are Essentially Self-Adjoint,
>Partial Derivative Operators are Also Bounded on S¹.
>But Exponentials Are Tempered Distributions. QED!
===
Subject: Re: Uniqueness of implicit functions
Epigone-thread: zhoabrarshel
Originator: israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel)
>>Consider two implicit functions:
>>f(x,y)=0,
>>g(x,y)=0.
>>What can be said about relation between them, if it is
known that
>>f(x,y)=0 iff g(x,y)=0.
>Maybe I don¹t understand what an implicit function is. If you
>mean, what can be said about two functions f,g : R^2 --> R
knowing
>that they vanish at the same points? the answer might be Not
much;
>I would say, for example, that f(x,y) = (sin(x) - cos(y) +
xy)^2 + 1
>and g(x,y) = ( exp(xy) + x - y )^2 + 1 are very different,
but
>they do vanish at the same points... .
>But that¹s assuming you meant x and y to be real. If you
allow
them to be
>complex the situation is different. IN particular, when f
and g
are both
>_polynomials_ and they vanish at the same points (x,y) in
C^2,
then by
>Hilbert¹s Nullstellensatz, the ideals (f) and (g) have the
same
radical
>in the ring C[x,y], so that f and g have the same irreducible
divisors
>(possibly to different powers, e.g. f = x^2y and g = x y^3.)
>>For example, if they are differentiable, then
>>f1(x,y)*g2(x,y) = f2(x,y)*g1(x,y), where f1,f2,g1,g2 are
derivatives
>>of corresponding function by the Þrst (second) variable.
>Fails in my example, above. More generally, if the
factorizations are
>f = product( (p_i)^(n_i) ) and g = product( (p_i)^(m_i) ) ,
then
>f_1 / f = sum( (n_i) (p_i)_1 / (p_i) ) and similarly for f_2
/ f,
>so that f_1 / f_2 =
> sum( (n_i) (p_i)_1 / (p_i) )/ sum( (n_i) (p_i)_2 / (p_i) )
>Of course g_1 / g_2 is almost identical; one need only
change the
n_i
>to m_i. So we don¹t have f_1 / f_2 = g_1 / g_2 unless f and g
>are powers of the same irreducible.
>I am told that the ring of analytic functions behaves in a
very
similar way;
>certainly the previous example suggests ways that your
conjecture
could fail.
>dave
>PS -- I tried to reach you much earlier but you did not
provide a way
>to determine a valid email address.
Sorry, in the previous post I, certainly, had to add some
remarkable
comments: There variables x,y are reals and both implicit
functions
f(x,y)=0, g(x,y)=0 deÞnes the same regular curve on the plane.
May be we should start with easier case:
Consider a regular (say, continuous) function y=f(x) of real
variable x on some interval B. It is required to Þnd all
functions
g(x,y) such, that equation g(x,y)=0 has y=f(x) as the only
solution,
when x is from B.
The current email is valid.
===
Subject: Re: Uniqueness of implicit functions
>Consider two implicit functions:
>f(x,y)=0,
>g(x,y)=0.
>What can be said about relation between them, if it is known
that
>f(x,y)=0 iff g(x,y)=0.
>>Maybe I don¹t understand what an implicit function is. If
you
>>mean, what can be said about two functions f,g : R^2 --> R
knowing
>>that they vanish at the same points? the answer might be
Not much;
>>I would say, for example, that f(x,y) = (sin(x) - cos(y) +
xy)^2 + 1
>>and g(x,y) = ( exp(xy) + x - y )^2 + 1 are very different,
but
>>they do vanish at the same points... .
>Sorry, in the previous post I, certainly, had to add some
remarkable
>comments: There variables x,y are reals and both implicit
functions
>f(x,y)=0, g(x,y)=0 deÞnes the same regular curve on the
plane.
>May be we should start with easier case:
>Consider a regular (say, continuous) function y=f(x) of real
>variable x on some interval B. It is required to Þnd all
functions
>g(x,y) such, that equation g(x,y)=0 has y=f(x) as the only
solution,
>when x is from B.
g(x,y) = h(x,y-f(x)) where h is any function (continuous if
you¹re
requiring g to be continuous) such that, for x in B, h(x,y) =
0 if and
only if y = 0.
Robert Israel israel@math.ubc.ca
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
===
Subject: Re: Uniqueness of implicit functions
Epigone-thread: zhoabrarshel
>>May be we should start with easier case:
>>Consider a regular (say, continuous) function y=f(x) of real
>>variable x on some interval B. It is required to Þnd all
functions
>>g(x,y) such, that equation g(x,y)=0 has y=f(x) as the only
solution,
>>when x is from B.
>g(x,y) = h(x,y-f(x)) where h is any function (continuous if
you¹re
>requiring g to be continuous) such that, for x in B, h(x,y)
= 0 if
and
>only if y = 0.
Please, explain, how one can prove, that all such functions
have the
form g(x,y) = h(x,y-f(x)).
Is there a way to generalized the result for the following
case:
Suppose that a function f(x1,...,xn)=0 (of real variables
x1,....,xn
on some connected set B^n) deÞnes a reqular curve in R^(n-1).
It is
required to Þnd all functions g(x1,...xn) such, that equation
g(x1,...,xn)=0 has this curve as the only solution in B^n.
===
Subject: Re: Uniqueness of implicit functions
>May be we should start with easier case:
>Consider a regular (say, continuous) function y=f(x) of real
>variable x on some interval B. It is required to Þnd all
functions
>g(x,y) such, that equation g(x,y)=0 has y=f(x) as the only
solution,
>when x is from B.
>>g(x,y) = h(x,y-f(x)) where h is any function (continuous if
you¹re
>>requiring g to be continuous) such that, for x in B, h(x,y)
= 0 if
>and
>>only if y = 0.
>Please, explain, how one can prove, that all such functions
have the
>form g(x,y) = h(x,y-f(x)).
Given g, simply deÞne h(x,y) = g(x,y+f(x)).
>Is there a way to generalized the result for the following
case:
>Suppose that a function f(x1,...,xn)=0 (of real variables
x1,....,xn
>on some connected set B^n) deÞnes a reqular curve in
R^(n-1). It is
>required to Þnd all functions g(x1,...xn) such, that equation
>g(x1,...,xn)=0 has this curve as the only solution in B^n.
I¹m not sure what you mean by a regular curve in R^(n-1). It¹s
certainly not a curve. Perhaps what you have in mind is
something
like this:
Suppose there¹s a continuous function r(x_1,...,x_{n-1}) on a
subset A of R^(n-1) such that for (x_1,...,x_n) in A and
x_{n-1} in R,
g(x_1,...,x_n) = 0 iff x_n = r(x_1,...,x_{n-1}).
Then h(x_1,...,x_n) =
g(x_1,...,x_{n-1},x_n+r(x_1,...,x_{n-1}))
is a continuous function on A x R such that
h(x_1,...,x_n) = 0 iff x_n = 0
and g(x_1,...,x_n) =
h(x_1,...,x_{n-1},x_n-r(x_1,...,x_{n-1})).
Robert Israel israel@math.ubc.ca
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
===
Subject: Re: Why exp(-st) in the Laplace Transform?
Paul,
I am not sure that I comprehend all of your commentary,
however I do =
note one of your statements
If you take the Laplace transform, ...
Shifting an exponential (exp(-st)) by a constant (t -> t + a)
is
equivalent to multiplying it by a real number (exp(-sa)).
Your statement is not quite valid, in that, for the case of a
Laplace =
transform, the transform variable s has both real and
imaginary =
components, thus exp(-sa) has both real and imaginary
components as =
well. As in the Fourier transform, you would integrate over
the =
imaginary component. It is the real component, however, which
=
distinguishes the Laplace Transform from the Fourier
Transform. That =
is, the real component of our multiplier will tend to
attenuate the =
function. An example of the use of a Laplace transform would
be to =
transform the unit step function U(t). Note that it¹s Laplace
Transform =
is determined to be 1/s, under the restriction re(s) > 0. The
Fourier =
Transform of U(t) does not exist.
Ed
--
Edward Hyman
EdwardH@email.uophx.edu
Other EMail: e.hyman@worldnet.att.net
> Does anyone have an explaination why the kernel function
exp(-st) =
was
> used in the deÞnition of the Laplace transform?
> Is there a physical meaning to the use of this function?
Here is a group-theoretic answer.
The existence (and utility) of both the Laplace and Fourier
transforms
come from the symmetry of the real line under translations (t
-> t + a,
where a is some constant shift). This is a one-dimensional Lie
group, so it is Abelian (commutative), and its unitary
irreducible
representations are therefore one-dimensional. These are the
Fourier
transform kernels, exp(-i w t), for w any real number. Under
the
translation operation (t -> t + a), these get multiplied by
the
(unitary) number exp(-i w a).
In other words, when you take the Fourier transform of a
well-behaved
complex function, you are splitting it into functions which
transform
in a simple way under translations! This splits the inÞnite-
dimensional space of functions over the real line (t) into an
inÞnite
number of one-dimensional subspaces (the Fourier kernels)
which are
dense (in nice functions), and which transform trivially
(multiplication by a constant) under translations. If you
draw the
Fourier kernels as their graph in the complex plane versus t,
they are
constant-pitch helices. Moving a constant-pitch helix by a
constant is
equivalent to rotating it!
If you take the Laplace transform, you are splitting a
well-behaved
function into its *real* irreducible representations:
exponentials!
Shifting an exponential (exp(-st)) by a constant (t -> t + a)
is
equivalent to multiplying it by a real number (exp(-sa)).
Taking the
Laplace transform is splitting the inÞnite-dimensional space
of
well-behaved functions into an inÞnite number of
one-dimensional
subspaces which are dense in well-behaved functions, and
which each
behave nicely under translations.
So, both the Laplace and Fourier transforms are sort of
splitting
functions into the normal modes of the group of translations
of
the real line.
===
Subject: This week in the mathematics arXiv (6 Dec - 10 Dec)
Here are this week¹s titles in the mathematics arXiv,
available at:
http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/
http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/submissions
This week in the mathematics arXiv may be freely redistributed
with attribution and without modiÞcation.
Titles in the mathematics arXiv (6 Dec - 10 Dec)
------------------------------------------------
AC: Commutative Algebra
-----------------------
math.AC/0412194
Srikanth Iyengar, Tony J. Puthenpurakal: Hilbert-Samuel
functions of
modules
over Cohen-Macaulay rings
math.AC/0412140
Juergen Herzog, Yukihide Takayama, Naoki Terai: On the
radical of a
monomial
ideal
AG: Algebraic Geometry
----------------------
math.AG/0412189
Gunther Cornelissen, Ariane Mezard: Relevements des
revetements de
courbes
faiblement ramiÞes (Lifts of weakly ramiÞed coverings of
curves)
math.AG/0412159
Johannes Huisman, Frederic Mangolte: Every connected sum of
lens spaces is
a
real component of a uniruled algebraic variety
math.AG/0412152
Matthieu Willems: K-theorie equivariante des varietes de
Bott-Samelson.
Application a la structure multiplicative de la K-theorie
equivariante
des
varietes de drapeaux
math.AG/0412150
Sergey Lysenko: Geometric Bessel models for GSp_4 and
multiplicity one
math.AG/0412148
Skip Garibaldi, Detlev Hoffmann: Totaro¹s question for G_2,
F_4, and E_6
math.AG/0412142
Marcos Jardim: Instanton sheaves on complex projective spaces
math.AG/0412134
Marian Aprodu: Remarks on syzygies of $d$-gonal curves
math.AG/0412121
Roman M. Fedorov: Algebraic and hamiltonian approaches to
isostokes
deformations
math.AG/0412117
GianMario Besana, Maria Lucia Fania: The dimension of the
Hilbert scheme
of
special threefolds
math.AG/0412103
H. Lange, S. Recillas: A family of Prym-Tyurin varieties of
exponent 3
math.AG/0412102
Izzet Coskun: The arithmetic and the geometry of Kobayashi
hyperbolicity
math.AG/0412089
Jun Li, Kefeng Liu, Jian Zhou: Topological String Partition
Functions as
Equivariant Indices
math.AG/0412075
Qing Liu: Stable reduction of Þnite covers of curves
math.AG/0412073
A. S. Buch, R. Rimanyi: A formula for non-equioriented quiver
orbits of
type
$A$
AP: Analysis of PDEs
--------------------
math.AP/0412160
Pierre Germain: Existence globale de solutions d¹energie
inÞnie de
l¹equation de Navier-Stokes 2D
math.AP/0412146
G. Barbatis, A. Tertikas: On a class of Rellich inequalities
math.AP/0412125
Daniel Alayon-Solarz: On Some ModiÞcations of the Fueter
Operator
math.AP/0412106
Khalil El Mehdi: On Conformal Paneitz Curvature Equations in
Higher
Dimensional Spheres
math.AP/0412105
Khalil El Mehdi: Single Blow up Solutions for a Slightly
Subcritical
Biharmonic Equation
math.AP/0412088
Olga S. Rozanova: Hydrodynamic approach to constructing
solutions of
Hydrodynamic approach to constructing solutions of nonlinear
Schrodinger
equation in the critical case
nlin.SI/0412010
A.S. Fokas: Linearizable Initial-Boundary Value Problems for
the
sine-Gordon
Equation on the Half-Line
nlin.SI/0412009
A.S. Fokas, J.T. Stuart: The Time Periodic Solution of the
Burgers
Equation
on the Half-Line and an Application to Steady Streaming
nlin.SI/0412008
A.S. Fokas, A.R. Its: The Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation on
the
Interval
nlin.SI/0412005
A.S. Fokas: The Davey-Stewartson I Equation on the Quarter
Plane with
Homogeneous Dirichlet Boundary Conditions
CA: Classical Analysis and ODEs
-------------------------------
math.CA/0412199
Michael Aristidou, Mark Davidson, Gestur ŒOlafsson: Laguerre
Functions on
Symmetric Cones and recursion relations in the Real Case
math.CA/0412174
Carlos Cabrelli, Michael Lacey, Ursula Molter, Jill C Pipher:
Variations
on
the Theme of Journe¹s Lemma
math.CA/0412115
V.Poberezhny: On Special monodromy groups and Riemann-Hilbert
problem for
Riemann equation
math.CA/0412081
J. M. Aldaz: An example on the maximal function associated to
a
nondoubling
measure
math.CA/0412080
Michael Schlosser: Noncommutative extensions of Ramanujan¹s
1-psi-1
summation
CO: Combinatorics
-----------------
math.CO/0412153
Hasan Coskun, Robert A. Gustafson: Well--Poised Macdonald
Functions
W_lambda
and Jackson CoefÞcients omega_lambda On BC_n
math.CO/0412130
C. De Concini, C. Procesi: On the geometry of graph
arrangements
cs.CC/0412013
Jean-Christophe Dubacq, Veronique Terrier: Signals for
Cellular Automata
in
dimension 2 or higher
math.CO/0412124
Richard Ehrenborg, Margaret Readdy: The Tchebyshev transforms
of the
Þrst
and second kind
math.CO/0412118
Theresia Eisenkolbl: (-1)-enumeration of self-complementary
plane
partitions
math.CO/0412114
Lars Engebretsen: Bipartite Multigraphs with Expander-Like
Properties
math.CO/0412091
Dan Bernstein: Euler-Mahonian polynomials for C_a wr S_n
cond-mat/0411630
Otto Pulkkinen, Juha Merikoski: Phase transitions on
Markovian bipartite
graphs - an application of the zero-range process
cond-mat/0407278
Dimitris Achlioptas, Cristopher Moore: The Chromatic Number
of Random
Regular Graphs
CV: Complex Variables
---------------------
math.CV/0412096
N.Kruzhilin, A.Sukhov: Pseudoholomorphic discs attached to
CR-submanifolds
of almost complex spaces
math.CV/0412095
H.Gaussier, A.Sukhov: On the geometry of model almost complex
manifolds
with
boundary
DG: Differential Geometry
-------------------------
math.DG/0412197
Ji-Ping Sha, Bruce Solomon: No skew branes on non-degenerate
hyperquadrics
math.DG/0412190
Isabel Fernandez, Francisco J. Lopez, Rabah Souam: The moduli
space of
embedded singly periodic maximal surfaces with isolated
singularities in
the
Lorentz-Minkowski space $l^3$
math.DG/0412185
D.H. Phong, Jacob Sturm: On stability and the convergence of
the
Kahler-Ricci þow
math.DG/0412169
Emilio Musso, Lorenzo Nicolodi: Tableaux over Lie algebras,
integrable
systems, and classical surface theory
math.DG/0412151
Anda Degeratu, Mark Stern: The Positive Mass Conjecture for
Non-spin
Manifolds
nlin.SI/0411051
V. D. Gershun: Integrable string and hydrodynamical type
models and
nonlocal
brackets
math.DG/0412127
John Lott, Cedric Villani: Ricci curvature for metric-measure
spaces via
optimal transport
gr-qc/0412020
Michael T. Anderson, Piotr T. Chrusciel: Asymptotically
simple solutions
of
the vacuum Einstein equations in even dimensions
math.DG/0412123
Bruce Kleiner, Bernhard Leeb: Rigidity of invariant convex
sets in
symmetric
spaces
math.DG/0412109
Ioan Bucataru: Metric nonlinear connections
math.DG/0412097
Marius Crainic: Generalized complex structures and Lie
brackets
math.DG/0412084
Mohammed Abouzaid, Mitya Boyarchenko: Local structure of
generalized
complex
manifolds
math.DG/0412071
T. Hasanis, A. Savas-Halilaj, T. Vlachos: Complete minimal
hypersurfaces
of
$S^4$ with zero Gauss-Kronecker curvature
math.DG/0412068
Li Ma: Some properties of non-compact complete Riemannian
manifolds
DS: Dynamical Systems
---------------------
math.DS/0412195
Abdelouahab Arouche, Mohamed Deffaf, Abdelghani Zeghib: On
Lorentz
dynamics
math.DS/0412180
Juan Rivera-Letelier: Sur la structure des ensembles de Fatou
p-adiques
math.DS/0412177
Nikos Frantzikinakis Bryna Kra: Polynomial conÞgurations on
integer
subsets
with positive density
math.DS/0412175
Bassam Fayad: Rank one and mixing differentiable þows
math.DS/0412172
Bassam Fayad: Smooth mixing þows with singular spectra
math.DS/0412167
J.-R. Chazottes, P. Collet, B. Schmitt: Statistical
Consequences of
Devroye
Inequality for Processes. Applications to a Class of
Non-Uniformly
Hyperbolic Dynamical Systems
math.DS/0412166
J.-R. Chazottes, P. Collet, B. Schmitt: Devroye Inequality
for a Class of
Non-Uniformly Hyperbolic Dynamical Systems
math.DS/0412162
Romain Dujardin: Some remarks on the connectivity of Julia
sets for
2-dimensional diffeomorphisms
math.DS/0412158
Konstantin Igudesman: Dynamics of inÞnite-multivalued
transformations
math.DS/0412098
S. Aranson, E. Zhuzhoma: Proof of the Morse conjecture for
analytic þows
on
orientable surfaces
math.DS/0412072
Ali Tahzibi, Vanderlei Horita: Partial Hyperbolicity for
Symplectic
Diffeomorphisms
math.DS/0412066
Julie Deserti, Dominique Cerveau: Feuilletages et actions de
groupes sur
les
espaces projectifs
FA: Functional Analysis
-----------------------
math.FA/0412171
G. Androulakis, K. Beanland, S.J. Dilworth, F. Sanacory:
Embedding
$ell_{infty}$ into the space of all Operators on Certain
Banach
Spaces
math.FA/0412165
Dmitry S. Kalyuzhnyu{i}-Verbovetzkiu{i}, Victor Vinnikov:
Non-commutative positive kernels and their matrix evaluations
math.FA/0412164
Dmitry S. Kalyuzhnyu{i}-Verbovetzkiu{i}: On the
{Bessmertnyu{i}} Class
of Homogeneous Positive Holomorphic Functions on a Product of
Matrix
Halfplanes
math.FA/0412163
Dmitry S. Kalyuzhnyu{i}-Verbovetzkiu{i}: Multivariable
$rho$-contractions
math.FA/0412161
Dmitry S. Kalyuzhnyu{i}-Verbovetzkiu{i}: Carath¹{e}odory
interpolation
on the non-commutative polydisk
math.FA/0412116
A.A.Shkalikov: On invariant subspaces of dissipative
operators in a space
with indeÞnite metric
math.FA/0412108
L. Biliotti, R. Exel, P. Piccione, D. V. Tausk: On the
Singularities of
the
Exponential Map in InÞnite Dimensional Riemannian Manifolds
GM: General Mathematics
-----------------------
math.GM/0412157
Frank Swenton: Limits and the system of near-numbers
math.GM/0412133
Jean-Marie Didry, Pierre-Yves Gaillard: Around the Chinese
Remainder
Theorem
math.GM/0412087
B.G.Sidharth: A New Integral Transform
GR: Group Theory
----------------
math.GR/0412136
Danny Calegari, Nathan M. DunÞeld: An ascending HNN extension
of a free
group inside SL(2,C)
math.GR/0412128
Ilya Kapovich: Currents on free groups
math.GR/0412101
Kai-Uwe Bux, Kevin Wortman: A Geometric proof that
SL(2,Z[t,1/t]) is not
Þnitely presented
GT: Geometric Topology
----------------------
math.GT/0412191
Benjamin Himpel: A Splitting Formula for the Spectral Flow of
the Odd
Signature Operator on 3-Manifolds Coupled to a Path of SU(2)
Connections
math.GT/0412187
Ekaterina Pervova, Carlo Petronio: Complexity and T-invariant
of Abelian
and
Milnor groups, and complexity of 3-manifolds
math.GT/0412184
Olga Plamenevskaya: Transverse knots and Khovanov homology
math.GT/0412183
Olga Plamenevskaya: Transverse knots, branched double covers
and Heegaard
Floer contact invariants
math.GT/0412147
Ben Klaff, Peter B. Shalen: The diameter of the set of
boundary slopes of
a
knot
math.GT/0412139
Ivan Izmestiev: On the hull numbers of torus links
math.GT/0412126
Ronald Fintushel, Ronald J. Stern: Double node neighborhoods
and families
of
simply connected 4-manifolds with b^+=1
math.GT/0412120
Denis Auroux: A stable classiÞcation of Lefschetz Þbrations
math.GT/0412078
Kenneth J. Shackleton: Tightness and computing distances in
the curve
complex
math.GT/0412074
Naoko Kamada: Span of the Jones polynomial of an alternating
virtual link
HO: History and Overview
------------------------
math.HO/0412154
Leonhard Euler: An analytical exercise
KT: K-Theory and Homology
-------------------------
math.KT/0412156
Wolfgang Lueck: K-and L-theory of the semi-direct product of
the discrete
three-dimensional Heisenberg group by Z/4
math.KT/0412131
Christian Voigt: A new description of equivariant cohomology
for totally
disconnected groups
LO: Logic
---------
math.LO/0412144
J. Michael Dunn, Tobias J. Hagge, Lawrence S. Moss, Zhenghan
Wang:
Quantum
logic as motivated by quantum computing
MG: Metric Geometry
-------------------
math.MG/0412111
Thierry Barbot, Francois Beguin, Abdelghani Zeghib: Constant
mean
curvature
foliations of globally hyperbolic spacetimes locally modelled
on $AdS_3$
math.MG/0412093
Gunter M. Ziegler: Polyhedral surfaces of high genus
cs.DS/0412008
Robert Krauthgamer, James R. Lee, Manor Mendel, Assaf Naor:
Measured
descent: A new embedding method for Þnite metrics
MP: Mathematical Physics
------------------------
quant-ph/0412053
M. Keyl: Quantum state estimation and large deviations
math-ph/0412029
Michel L. Lapidus, Erin P. J. Pearse: A tube formula for the
Koch
snowþake
curve, with applications to complex dimensions
math-ph/0412028
Christopher J. Fewster, Stefan Hollands: Quantum Energy
Inequalities in
two-dimensional conformal Þeld theory
math-ph/0412027
Christopher J. Fewster, Izumi Ojima, Martin Porrmann:
p-Nuclearity in a
New
Perspective
math-ph/0412026
F. Hiroshima, K. R. Ito: Mass Renormalization in
Non-relativistic Quantum
Electrodynamics with Spin 1/2
math-ph/0412025
Mihai Stoiciu: The Statistical Distribution of the Zeros of
Random
Paraorthogonal Polynomials on the Unit Circle
math-ph/0412024
Antonio Hern¹andez-Gardu~no, Ernesto A. Lacomba: Collisions
and
regularization for the 3-vortex problem
hep-th/0412091
D. D. Dimitrijevic, G. S. Djordjevic, Lj. Nesic: Propagator
for the Free
math-ph/0412023
Elliott H. Lieb, Robert Seiringer, Jakob Yngvason:
JustiÞcation of
c-Number
Substitutions in Bosonic Hamiltonians
math-ph/0412022
Aarti Sawant, Amit Acharya: Model Reduction via Parametrized
Invariant
Manifolds: Some Examples
math-ph/0412021
Zhi-Ming Gu: The Lie Group Structure of the $eta-xi$
Space-time and
its
Physical SigniÞcance
math-ph/0412020
T. Sakaguchi: An asymptotic formula for models with caustics
hep-th/0412061
Jasbir Nagi: On Extensions of Superconformal Algebras
hep-th/0412058
Andrzej Herdegen: Asymptotic algebra of quantum
electrodynamics
quant-ph/0411197
Bernd Kuckert, Jens Mund: Spin & Statistics in
Nonrelativistic Quantum
Mechanics, II
nlin.SI/0412018
M. Blaszak, A. Sergyeyev: Maximal superintegrability of
Benenti systems
nlin.SI/0412017
Fabio Musso, Matteo Petrera, Orlando Ragnisco, Giovanni Satta:
Backlund
transformations for the rational Lagrange chain
math-ph/0412019
Roman Shvydkoy: The essential spectrum of advective equations
math-ph/0412018
Christian Hainzl, Mathieu Lewin, Christof Sparber: Existence
of
global-in-time solutions to a generalized Dirac-Fock type
evolution
equation
math-ph/0412017
Yan V. Fyodorov: Introduction to the Random Matrix Theory:
Gaussian
Unitary
Ensemble and Beyond
math-ph/0412016
Boyka Aneva, Todor Popov: Hopf Structure and Green Ansatz of
Deformed
Parastatistics Algebras
math-ph/0412014
Giuseppe Ruzzi: Homotopy, net-cohomology and superselection
sectors in
globally hyperbolic spacetimes
hep-th/0411094
Vladimir V. Bazhanov, Vladimir V. Mangazeev: Eight-vertex
model and
non-stationary Lame equation
math-ph/0412015
Didier Robert: Non linear eigenvalue problems
math-ph/0410002
P. Di Francesco, P. Zinn-Justin, J.-B. Zuber: Determinant
Formulae for
some
Tiling Problems and Application to Fully Packed Loops
gr-qc/0412012
Jorma Louko, Robert B. Mann, Donald Marolf: Geons with spin
and charge
cond-mat/0412034
M. Aizenman, E.H. Lieb, R. Seiringer, J.P. Solovej, J.
Yngvason:
Bose-Einstein Condensation as a Quantum Phase Transition in
an Optical
Lattice
quant-ph/0412016
B. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, C. Quesne, V. M. Tkachuk: Deformed
shape
invariance
and exactly solvable Hamiltonians with position-dependent
effective mass
math-ph/0412013
Daniel Alayon-Solarz: We call attention to the unusual
properties that the
4
dimensional solutions for a modiÞed Fueter-Dirac equations
satisfy: In a
coordinate-free, constant-free and strictly mathematical way
it is
possible
to show that all the solutions for a modiÞed Fueter-Dirac
Equation,
which
are radial symmetric when restricted to the 3-space, have a
nice
algebraic
structure. Locally, these solutions behave naturally in a
algebraic way
determined by a certain commutative ring related to the
quaternions with
non-invertibles. This ring has a nontrivial localization. By
using left
and
right versions of the operator we obtain quirality
math-ph/0412012
Hatem Najar: About a result of S.M. Kozlov
math-ph/0412011
Sebastian Formanski, Maciej Przanowski: $ast$-SDYM Fields and
Heavenly
Spaces. I. $ast$-SDYM equations as an integrable system
math-ph/0412010
Takao Suzuki: Classical solutions of the degenerate Garnier
system and
their
coalescence structures
math-ph/0412009
Elliott H. Lieb, Robert Seiringer: A Stronger Subadditivity
of Entropy
math-ph/0412008
Andrei Okounkov: Random surfaces enumerating algebraic curves
NA: Numerical Analysis
----------------------
physics/0412030
A.S. Fokas, A. Iserles, V. Marinakis: Reconstruction
Algorithms for
Positron
Emission Tomography and Single Photon Emission Computed
Tomography and
their
Numerical Implementation
physics/0412028
A.S. Fokas, Y. Kurylev, V. Marinakis: The Unique
Determination of
Neuronal
Currents in the Brain via Magnetoencephalography
math.NA/0412112
Massimo Fornasier: Nonlinear projection digital image
inpainting and
restoration methods
NT: Number Theory
-----------------
math.NT/0412181
Michael O. Rubinstein: Computational methods and experiments
in analytic
number theory
math.NT/0412178
Luis Dieulefait: Appendix to: The level 1 weight 2 case of
Serre¹s
conjecture - a strategy for a proof
math.NT/0412176
Hershy Kisilevsky, Jack Sonn: Abelian extensions of global
Þelds with
constant local degrees
math.NT/0412173
Matilde N. Lalin: Mahler measure of some n-variable
polynomial families
math.NT/0412145
Francesca Aicardi, Vladlen Timorin: On perfect binary
quadratic forms
math.NT/0412141
Victor Beresnevich, Sanju Velani: A Mass Transference
Principle and the
DufÞn-Schaeffer conjecture for Hausdorff measures
math.NT/0412135
A. Granville, P. Kurlberg: Poisson statistics via the Chinese
remainder
theorem
math.NT/0412104
Ariel Pacetti, Gonzalo Tornaria: Examples of Shimura
correspondence for
level p^2 and real quadratic twists
math.NT/0412099
Luis Dieulefait: The level 1 weight 2 case of Serre¹s
conjecture - a
strategy for a proof
math.NT/0412090
Shinji Fukuhara: Hecke operators on weighted Dedekind symbols
math.NT/0412086
R. de la Breteche, T.D. Browning: On Manin¹s conjecture for
singular del
Pezzo surfaces of degree four, I
math.NT/0412083
Brian Conrey, Jon Keating, Michael Rubinstein, Nina Snaith:
Random Matrix
Theory and the Fourier CoefÞcients of Half-Integral Weight
Forms
math.NT/0412079
G. Everest, S. Stevens, D. Tamsett, T. Ward: Primitive
Divisors of
Quadratic
Polynomial Sequences
math.NT/0412076
Chandrashekhar Khare, Jean-Pierre Wintenberger: On Serre¹s
reciprocity
conjecture for 2-dimensional mod p representations of the
Galois group of
Q
math.NT/0412067
Yoshinori Yamasaki: q-Analogues of the Barnes multiple zeta
functions
math.NT/0412065
Lei Yang: Hessian polyhedra, invariant theory and Appell
hypergeometric
partial differential equations
math.NT/0412063
Eduardo Duenez, Steven J. Miller, Howard Straubing, Amitabha
Roy:
Incomplete
Quadratic Exponential Sums in Several Variables
OA: Operator Algebras
---------------------
math.OA/0412170
Ilwoo Cho: Diagonal Tracial Graph W*-Probability Theory
math.OA/0412138
George Eleftherakis: Decompositions of Reþexive Bimodules
over Maximal
Abelian Selfadjoint Algebras
math.OA/0412137
Bojan Magajna: On tensor products of operator modules
math.OA/0412129
Huaxin Lin, Hiroki Matui: Minimal dynamical systems on the
product of the
Cantor set and the circle II
math.OA/0412107
Rolf Gohm: Decompositions of Beurling Type for E_0-Semigroups
OC: Optimization and Control
----------------------------
math.OC/0412070
Lorenzo Finesso, Peter Spreij: Nonnegative Matrix
Factorization and
I-Divergence Alternating Minimization
PR: Probability
---------------
math.PR/0412198
Pablo A. Ferrari, James B. Martin, Leandro P. R. Pimentel:
Roughening and
inclination of competition interfaces
math.PR/0412196
Jan Obloj, Marc Yor: On local martingale and its supremum:
harmonic
functions and beyond
math.PR/0412193
Djalil Chafai, Didier Concordet: A continuous stochastic
maturation model
math.PR/0412188
Hanene Mohamed, Philippe Robert: A Probabilistic Analysis of
Some Tree
Algorithms
math.PR/0412182
Misja Nuyens: The Foregound-Background Processor Sharing
Queue: an
overview
math.PR/0412155
James Allen Fill, Nevin Kapur, Alois Panholzer: Destruction
of very
simple
trees
cond-mat/0412166
Thierry Huillet: Random Partitioning Problems Involving
Poisson Point
Processes On The Interval
math.PR/0412092
Oliver Delzeith: On Skorohod spaces as universal sample path
spaces
QA: Quantum Algebra
-------------------
math.QA/0412192
D.I. Gurevich, P.N. Pyatov, P.A. Saponov: Cayley-Hamilton
theorem for
quantum matrix algebras of GL(m|n) type
math.QA/0412149
Kevin Costello: Topological conformal Þeld theories and
Calabi-Yau
categories
math.QA/0412143
Pavel Etingof, Shlomo Gelaki: Liftings of graded quasi-Hopf
algebras with
radical of prime codimension
math.QA/0412122
I. Balint, K. Szlachanyi: Finitary Galois extensions over
noncommutative
bases
math.QA/0412113
Alice Fialowski, Martin Schlichenmaier: Global geometric
deformations of
current algebras as Krichever-Novikov type algebras
math.QA/0412100
Shao-You Zhao, Kang-Jie Shi, Rui-Hong Yue: The Center for the
Elliptic
Quantum Group $E_{tau,eta}(sl_n)$
math.QA/0412094
Ferenc Gerlits: The Euler characteristic of graph complexes
via Feynman
diagrams
math.QA/0412069
Anatol. N. Kirillov, Toshiaki Maeno: A note on quantization
operators on
Nichols algebra model for Schubert calculus on Weyl groups
RT: Representation Theory
-------------------------
math.RT/0412186
Issai Kantor, Gregory Shpiz: Graded Lie algebras deÞned by
Jordan
algebras
and their representations
math.RT/0412179
Meighan I. Dillon: Constructing Graded Lie Algebras
math.RT/0412168
G. Lusztig: Character sheaves on disconnected groups, VII
math.RT/0412119
Yuly Billig: Jet modules
math.RT/0412085
Henning Krause, Jue Le: The Auslander-Reiten formula for
complexes of
modules
math.RT/0412077
Aslak Bakke Buan, Robert J. Marsh, Idun Reiten: Cluster
mutation via
quiver
representations
SG: Symplectic Geometry
-----------------------
math.SG/0412110
Paul Biran: Lagrangian non-Intersections
math.SG/0412082
Timothy J. Hodges, Milen Yakimov: Triangular Poisson
structures on Lie
groups and symplectic reduction
SP: Spectral Theory
-------------------
math.SP/0412132
B. Chenaud, P. Duclos, P. Freitas, D. Krejcirik:
Geometrically induced
discrete spectrum in curved tubes
math.SP/0412064
Colin Guillarmou: Resonances on some geometrically Þnite
hyperbolic
manifolds
ST: Statistics
--------------
cs.NI/0412037
David B. Chua, Eric D. Kolaczyk, Mark Crovella: A Statistical
Framework
for
EfÞcient Monitoring of End-to-End Network Properties
--
/ Greg Kuperberg (UC Davis)
/ Home page: http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~greg/
/ Visit the Math ArXiv Front at http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/
/ * All the math that¹s Þt to e-print *
===
Subject: Schatten Class Operators
Epigone-thread: jongþeldbrend
Hi all,
Could someone please give me a good reference on the Schatten
Class
Operators? I read about this kind of Operators in the book
Operator
theory in function spaces by K. Zhu but I can¹t Þgure out how
to
show that S_p (the p-Schatten Class Operators) is a complete
normed
space for 1<=p=N
(2) sum(ak-bk)=0
If (2) then the respective convergents pn/qn and cn/dn lie on
the
same horizontal line in the Stern-Brocot tree (for n>=N). If
(1)
then Lagrange showed that x2=f(x1) where f(x)=(ax+b)/(cx+d)
with
integer coefÞcients (if I remember correctly).
Question 1: is there en explicit form for f (for instance
knowing ak,bk for k[a0+b0;a1+b1,a2+b2,...] in terms
of x1 and
x2?
Loic