mm-4389
===
Subject: Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
PS: These are part of my solutions, if the solution you want
isnOt on the list, do not give up, just contact with me:
My email is solutionpay(at)hotmail.com( please replace the (at) with @ )
NOTE:
if the solutions you want is on the list renewed, please mention in your
email,thank you!
Solution manual for the list:.81B
http://rapidshare.com/files/52408080/list.doc
I will reply with your Email within 12 hours!!
advanced engineering mathematics (8/e) by ERWIN KREYSZIG
advanced engineering mathematics.81i9/e.81j by ERWIN KREYSZIG
advanced macroeconomics
Analytical Mechanics (7/e) By Grant R. Fowles, George L. Cassiday
applied mathematics and modelling forchemical engineers(8/e)
Applied Strength of Materials (4th Edition) by Robert MoTT
Boyce Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems by
Willian E.Boyce
C How to Program, 3RD Edition 2000 By Harvey M. Deitel
Calculus I, II, Transidentals 10e BY George B. Thomas
Calculus with Analytic Geometry
Calculus, 4th edition by James Stewart
Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics By Karkenahalli Srinivas, Clive
A. J. Fletcher
Computer Organization and Design: The Hardware/Software Interface93/e) by
David A. Patterson, John L. Hennessy
Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuit by B. Razavi
Digital and Analog Communication Systems by LEON W. COUCH
Digital and Analog Communication Systems .81C5th, by Leon W. Couch, Leon
W., II Couch .
DISCRETE-TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING/2e by Oppenheim.81ASchafer
Econometric Analysis (6/e) by willian H.GREENE
Econometric Analysis ,5th Edition, by William H. Greene
Electric Machinery Fundamentals 4/e By Stephen J. Chapman
Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 4/e , by S. J. Chapman.
Electrical Circuits (7/e) by James W. Nilsson, and Susan A.
Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems , 8th.81Cby
William E. Boyce (Author), Richard C
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes
Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering By H Fogler
Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (3rd)by H.Scott Fogler
Engineering electromagnetics (6/e) by HAYT
Engineering electromagnetics (7/e) by HAYT
Engineering Fluid Mechanics, 7th Edition By Clayton T. Crowe, Donald F.
Elger, John A. Roberson
Engineering Mathematics, 4th Edition ,by John Bird
Engineering Mechanics - Dynamics (11th ) by R.C.HIBBELER
Engineering Mechanics - Statics (11th ) by R.C.HIBBELER
Engineering Mechanics - Statics and Dynamics,11th, by Russell C Hibbeler.
Engineering Mechanics, Dynamics 5th By J. L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige
Engineering Mechanics: Statics By R.C. Hibbeler
Engineering Mechanics: Statics ,10th ,by R.C.Hibbeler,
field and wave electromagnetics (2/e) by David Cheng
Fundamentals of Logic Design 5Ed by CharlesRoth
Fundamentals of Chemical Reaction Engineering By Mark E. E. Davis, Robert
J. J. Davis
Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 5th by By Bruce R. Munson, Donald, 
Theodore
H. Okiishi,
Fundamentals of Organic Chemistry, 5E
Fundamentals of Thermodynamics 6ed By Richard E. Sonntag
Heat Transfer: A Practical Approach
Hornback's Organic Chemistry, 2nd
Introduction to Electrodynamics(3/e) by David J. Griffiths
Introduction to Heat Transfer 4th Edition By Frank P. Incropera, David
Introduction to Solid State Physics (8 ED) by Charles.Kittel__
MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS (2/e) (chapter1-9) by Tom M. Apostol
Mechanical Engineering Design By Joseph Shigley, Charles Mischke,
Mechanics of Materials 96/E) by R.C.Hibbeler
Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd Edition, by Hal R. Varian
Microeconomic Theory by Andreu Mas-Colell, Michael D. Whinston,
Modern Control Engineering/ 4E by K.OGATA
Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems (3/e)
Organic Chemistry, 2th by Hornback
Physica Chemistry 7th.Ed. by Atkins
Physical Chemistry (7/e) by Peter Atkins and Julio de Paula
Physical Chemistry (7th) by P.W.Atkins
Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Serway'& Jewett
Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists, 8th by Sharon Myers ,
Keying Ye, Walpole
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences 7/e JAY 
L.DEVORE
Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes,3rd, by Athanasios
Papoulis
Signals and Systems (2nd Edition)
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach,5th Ed. by Cengel
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach,6th Ed. by Cengel
Thomas' Calculus (11th Edition) by George B Thomas
University Physics with Modern Physics By Hugh D. Young
Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Statics, 7th By Ferdinand P. Beer
Visual C++ How to Program, (3rd Edition) ,by Harvey & Paul Deitel &
Associates
Zill's a First Course in Differential Equations with Modeling
Applicants 7/e
http://pdfsolution.spaces.live.com
===
Subject: Re: Partial Fractions (info + some question)
first of all. To everyone not familiar with it:
when you have: for some numbers: a, x_1, x_2 ... x_n
a/ (x - x_1)(x - x_2) ...(x- x_n)
it's easy to write it on the from ( A, B ....N elements og R)
A / (x - x_1) + B / (x - x_2) ... N / x - x_n)
by: 1) ask: what is x to so that (x - x_1) = 0 ?
>2) insert this into the original fraction, but do not include (x- x_1)
>the answer is your A
>3) repeate for (x - x_2) ... (x - x_n) (instead of (x-x_1)) to find
>B ...N
now the question: If I dont have all linear terms, is there a verson
>of this algoritm that I can use???
>[and maybe(?) why does this work:P ?]
Here's why it works. I will demonstrate with three factors but the
> idea is the same. Your typical problem would be something like:
d / ( (x-a)(x-b)(x-c) ) = A / (x-a) + B / (x-b) + C / (x-c)
where you want to solve for A, B, and C to make the right side equal
> the left side. If we put the right side over a common denominator we
> get:
d / ( (x-a)(x-b)(x-c) ) =
> ( A(x-b)(x-c) + B (x-a)(x-c) + C(x-a)(x-b) ) / ( (x-a)(x-b)(x-c) )
Since both sides must be identical and they have the same
> denominators, the numerators must be identical:
d = A(x-b)(x-c) + B (x-a)(x-c) + C(x-a)(x-b)
This must be an identity, so it must be true for any and all values of
> x that we may care to try. Notice what happens when we take x = a. Two
> terms drop out and we get:
d = A(a-b)(a-c) which says that A = d / ( (a-b)(a-c) )
Now look back at the first equation above. Notice what happens if you
> put x = a in the left side. It gives you:
d / ( (a-a)(a-b)(a-c) )
which doesn't make any sense. But if you cover up the (a-a) factor
> with your finger, what is left is the correct answer. So it gives you
> a handy shortcut. The same idea works for solving for B and C.
There is a similar shortcut for repeated factors which involves
> differentiation, but it has been my experience that it is just easier
> to do the work as above as learn that shortcut. If I recall correctly,
> early versions of C.R. Wylie's Advanced Engineering Mathematics text
> develops those other shortcuts. It should be available in a university
> library.
--Lynn
Here's another approach: If
1/((x-a)(x-b)(x-c)) = A/(x-a) + B/(x-b) + C/(x-c)
for x not equal to a, b, or c, then
1/((x-b)(x-c)) = A + (x-a)[B/(x-b) + C/(x-c)]
for the same x's. But now both sides are clearly continuous at a.
Plugging in a then gives 1/((a-b)(a-c)) on the left and A + 0*[B/(a-b)
+ C/(a-c)] = A on the right. Therefore 1/((a-b)(a-c)) = A.
===
Subject: Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
PS: These are part of my solutions, if the solution you want isn't on
the list, do not give up, just contact with me:
My email is solutionpay(at)hotmail.com( please replace the (at) with
@ )
NOTE:
if the solutions you want is on the list renewed, please mention in
your email,thank you!
Solution manual for the list:
http://rapidshare.com/files/52408080/list.doc
I will reply with your Email within 12 hours!!
advanced engineering mathematics (8/e) by ERWIN KREYSZIG
advanced engineering mathematics9/e
by ERWIN KREYSZIG
advanced macroeconomics
Analytical Mechanics (7/e) By Grant R. Fowles, George L.
Cassiday
applied mathematics and modelling forchemical engineers(8/e)
Applied Strength of Materials (4th Edition) by Robert MoTT
Boyce Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems by
Willian E.Boyce
C How to Program, 3RD Edition 2000 By Harvey M. Deitel
Calculus I, II, Transidentals 10e BY George B. Thomas
Calculus with Analytic Geometry
Calculus, 4th edition by James Stewart
Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics By Karkenahalli Srinivas,
Clive A. J. Fletcher
Computer Organization and Design: The Hardware/Software Interface93/
e) by David A. Patterson, John L. Hennessy
Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuit by B. Razavi
Digital and Analog Communication Systems by LEON W. COUCH
Digital and Analog Communication Systems 5th, by Leon W.
Couch, Leon
W., II Couch .
DISCRETE-TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING/2e by
OppenheimSchafer
Econometric Analysis (6/e) by willian H.GREENE
Econometric Analysis ,5th Edition, by William H. Greene
Electric Machinery Fundamentals 4/e By Stephen J. Chapman
Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 4/e , by S. J. Chapman.
Electrical Circuits (7/e) by James W. Nilsson, and Susan
A.
Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems ,
8thby
William E. Boyce (Author), Richard C
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes
Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering By H Fogler
Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (3rd)by H.Scott Fogler
Engineering electromagnetics (6/e) by HAYT
Engineering electromagnetics (7/e) by HAYT
Engineering Fluid Mechanics, 7th Edition By Clayton T. Crowe, Donald
F. Elger, John A. Roberson
Engineering Mathematics, 4th Edition ,by John Bird
Engineering Mechanics - Dynamics (11th ) by R.C.HIBBELER
Engineering Mechanics - Statics (11th ) by R.C.HIBBELER
Engineering Mechanics - Statics and Dynamics,11th, by Russell C
Hibbeler.
Engineering Mechanics, Dynamics 5th By J. L. Meriam, L. G.
Kraige
Engineering Mechanics: Statics By R.C. Hibbeler
Engineering Mechanics: Statics ,10th ,by R.C.Hibbeler,
field and wave electromagnetics (2/e) by David Cheng
Fundamentals of Logic Design 5Ed by CharlesRoth
Fundamentals of Chemical Reaction Engineering By Mark E. E. Davis,
Robert J. J. Davis
Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 5th by By Bruce R. Munson, Donald,
Theodore H. Okiishi,
Fundamentals of Organic Chemistry, 5E
Fundamentals of Thermodynamics 6ed By Richard E. Sonntag
Heat Transfer: A Practical Approach
Hornback's Organic Chemistry, 2nd
Introduction to Electrodynamics(3/e) by David J. Griffiths
Introduction to Heat Transfer 4th Edition By Frank P. Incropera,
David
Introduction to Solid State Physics (8 ED) by
Charles.Kittel
MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS (2/e) (chapter1-9) by Tom M. Apostol
Mechanical Engineering Design By Joseph Shigley, Charles Mischke,
Mechanics of Materials 96/E) by R.C.Hibbeler
Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd Edition, by Hal R. Varian
Microeconomic Theory by Andreu Mas-Colell, Michael D. Whinston,
Modern Control Engineering/ 4E by K.OGATA
Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems (3/e)
Organic Chemistry, 2th by Hornback
Physica Chemistry 7th.Ed. by Atkins
Physical Chemistry (7/e) by Peter Atkins and Julio de
Paula
Physical Chemistry (7th) by P.W.Atkins
Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Serway'&
Jewett
Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists, 8th by Sharon
Myers , Keying Ye, Walpole
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences 7/e JAY
L.DEVORE
Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes,3rd, by
Athanasios Papoulis
Signals and Systems (2nd Edition)
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach,5th Ed. by Cengel
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach,6th Ed. by Cengel
Thomas' Calculus (11th Edition) by George B Thomas
University Physics with Modern Physics By Hugh D. Young
Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Statics, 7th By Ferdinand P.
Beer
Visual C++ How to Program, (3rd Edition) ,by Harvey & Paul Deitel &
Associates
Zill's a First Course in Differential Equations with Modeling
Applicants 7/e
http://pdfsolution.spaces.live.com
===
Subject: Re: solutions manual
I need a copy of Heat Transfer (2nd Ed, A.F. Mills) andShugley's
> Mechanical Engineering Design (8th Ed., Budynas). Let me know costs
> and how to order.
Heat Transfer
by A.F. Mills
2nd edition is available second hand, links can be found through Amazon.
Mechanical Engineering Design
by Joseph Shigley, Charles Mischke, Richard Budynas
**7th** edition is available from Amazon.
I'm not endorsing Amazon, I'm just reminding you that the way to get
books is through book sellers.
--
He that giveth to the poor lendeth to the Lord, and shall be repaid,
said Mrs Fairchild, hastily slipping a shilling into the poor woman's
hand.
===
Subject: solution manual
looking for sol. manual in engineering mechanics
===
Subject: Re: solution manual
just contact with solutionpay@hotmail.com, best wishes
===
Subject: Re: solution manual
looking for sol. manual in engineering mechanics
Does that identify a book? You are even more stupid that the others who
are seeking solution manuals.
--
He that giveth to the poor lendeth to the Lord, and shall be repaid,
said Mrs Fairchild, hastily slipping a shilling into the poor woman's
hand.
===
Subject: numerical calculation about curve length
I think I have returned all my math back to teachers without any refund.
y=f(x);
h=xb-xa, which is very small.
My Q is to calculate curve length rather than area numerically.
But let me use area as example to show you what i want.
to calculate area between xa to xb, we have 2 ways:
1) area=(f(xa)+f(xb))*h/2; (trapezoid?)
2) area=(f(xa)+4*f(xm)+f(xb))*h/6; here xm=(xa+xb)/2; (parabola?)
As my test, second one is much better than first.
for curve length:
1) len=square root( (f(xb)-f(xa))*(f(xb)-f(xa)) + h*h);
actually, it is distance from (xa, f(xa)) to (xb, f(xb)).
do you know second way to calculate curve length as in area sample above,
simple, easy-to-use and better?
any links or explainations are highly appreciated.
===
Subject: Re: numerical calculation about curve length
I am Victor 000.
where are many of your one of many?
could you show me some of them?
===
Subject: Re: numerical calculation about curve length
I think I have returned all my math back to teachers without any refund.
y=f(x);
> h=xb-xa, which is very small.
My Q is to calculate curve length rather than area numerically.
> But let me use area as example to show you what i want.
to calculate area between xa to xb, we have 2 ways:
> 1) area=(f(xa)+f(xb))*h/2; (trapezoid?)
> 2) area=(f(xa)+4*f(xm)+f(xb))*h/6; here xm=(xa+xb)/2; (parabola?)
> As my test, second one is much better than first.
for curve length:
> 1) len=square root( (f(xb)-f(xa))*(f(xb)-f(xa)) + h*h);
> actually, it is distance from (xa, f(xa)) to (xb, f(xb)).
do you know second way to calculate curve length as in area sample above,
simple, easy-to-use and better?
Curve length is an integral so you can use the trapezoid rule or
whatever takes your fancy. An interesting question is, is one of the
many numerical methods especially suited to the curve length integral
because of the integral's particular form?
--
He that giveth to the poor lendeth to the Lord, and shall be repaid,
said Mrs Fairchild, hastily slipping a shilling into the poor woman's
hand.
===
Subject: Heat Convection_Latif Jiji
Can someone send me please get me the solution manual to Heat
Email me at rossthan@yahoo.com
===
Subject: JSH: What is surrogate factoring? Once more.
IN arguing about research I call surrogate factoring, I bump into this
weird thing where posters seem to be lost on what is actually going
on, so I thought I'd start a thread informing, yet again, what
surrogate factoring is.
Years ago, while thinking about RSA encryption, I wondered to myself
if instead of directly attacking a large number that you wanted to
factor, you might instead factor some other number and in that way
factor the target.
I termed the concept: surrogate factoring.
So, to repeat, years ago, as in about four years ago I think it was, I
was just kind of wondering about factoring because I was thinking
about RSA encryption, and I wondered if you might go after a large
composite that was otherwise hard to factor, by instead factoring some
other number.
To me a good name for the concept was surrogate factoring, so it was
called surrogate factoring.
Now years later I have finally settled in my own mind that
mathematically the concept reduces to considering
x^2 = y^2 mod T
and
k = 2x mod T
and equations that result from those two basic congruences, where T is
the target, which took me about three years to figure out.
With those two relations I found that my surrogate to factor is given
by deriving
(x+k)^2 = y^2 + 2k^2 + nT
as then the surrogate S, is
S = 2k^2 + nT
and the big question is, how do you pick k and n?
For those of you who wonder how it works from there, it's trivial
algebra that if you let
4f_1*f_2 = 2k^2 + nT
then
x+y = 2f_1 - k and x-y = 2f_2 - k
so once you factor the surrogate S, you just loop through solutions
for x+y and x-y, by going through the various possible values for f_1
and f_2, and check the gcd with T.
So, to recap, about four years ago I was wondering whether or not you
could go after an RSA sized number to try and factor it by instead
factoring another number. For years I tried various approaches and
last year I boiled down the idea to two congruence relations, which
lead through some simple algebra to a way to factor the target T, by
factoring the surrogate S.
So I had an idea, and after four years I have the math that implements
the idea.
That is the pure math aspect of it all where a person just pursues a
mathematical problem for the hell of it, you might say, while, of
course, I had practical reasons for picking the factoring problem.
Now then, from the realm of mathematical curiosity to a world changing
idea requires that surrogate factoring be a way to actually factor a
large composite faster than the other known methods, which is where
the arguing comes in with people who want to be certain that no one
believes it can be, or who are getting on my case for declaring it is,
and then not delivering by factoring some large number.
But that is secondary, as it is a practical matter that can move stock
markets and scare people because if surrogate factoring makes
factoring easy, then a lot of industries around the world would be
impacted.
But what real mathematician cares about practical crap anyway?
So there is the pure math of being curious about this way to factor.
And to the extent that math people act more like business people who
care about the practical side than math people who would care about
the curiosity side, I point out a contradiction!
Maybe they are not math people after all, eh?
As there is the practical and political reality of possibly changing
the world with a simple concept.
Understand surrogate factoring now?
Oh yeah, so recently I came up with a detailed analysis of when and
why surrogate factoring works, which has some very complicated looking
equations in it, so it is a massive puzzle.
A MASSIVE puzzle.
Some have done experiments where they claim that surrogate factoring
works worse than random!
And the world hangs in the balance on the answer, or maybe not, if
it's just a crap idea, but for some reason, supposedly brilliant
mathematicians have not settled the question so that the stock markets
can rest easy.
And your fate may depend on the answer, so the math world cannot keep
looking, so Google and Yahoo! search results move accordingly, as if
this concept is viable, then it ends the modern math world as it
currently operates.
But, on the other hand, it is also just a 'pure math' idea in a lot of
ways.
Two ways of looking at it, and entire economies can be destroyed if
people do not do the right thing here, and guess wrong.
James Harris
===
Subject: Re: JSH: What is surrogate factoring? Once more.
> Years ago, while thinking about RSA encryption, I wondered to myself
> if instead of directly attacking a large number that you wanted to
> factor, you might instead factor some other number and in that way
> factor the target.
So factoring 1024 helps when factoring 234576345712341234789346857? I
somehow doubt that...
> With those two relations I found that my surrogate to factor is given
> by deriving
(x+k)^2 = y^2 + 2k^2 + nT
as then the surrogate S, is
S = 2k^2 + nT
and the big question is, how do you pick k and n?
Easy, pick k = 9 and n = 0.
> For those of you who wonder how it works from there, it's trivial
> algebra that if you let
4f_1*f_2 = 2k^2 + nT
then
x+y = 2f_1 - k and x-y = 2f_2 - k
so once you factor the surrogate S, you just loop through solutions
> for x+y and x-y, by going through the various possible values for f_1
> and f_2, and check the gcd with T.
In my example, no factor of the surrogate is a factor of T (gcd is 1). I
have just found a counterexample that breaks your method, so it doesn't
work.
> That is the pure math aspect of it all where a person just pursues a
> mathematical problem for the hell of it, you might say, while, of
> course, I had practical reasons for picking the factoring problem.
You think it will make you a big shot if you solve it. But you haven't,
so everything is still hypothetical
> But what real mathematician cares about practical crap anyway?
Anyone who wants to get funding for research?
> Understand surrogate factoring now?
No, it doesn't seem to work.
> And the world hangs in the balance on the answer, or maybe not, if
> it's just a crap idea, but for some reason, supposedly brilliant
> mathematicians have not settled the question so that the stock markets
> can rest easy.
I would say that most of the world does not really care about factoring.
Most high-class encryption uses more mathematically difficult methods.
P=NP matters more (i.e., tractably cracking encryption methods).
> Two ways of looking at it, and entire economies can be destroyed if
> people do not do the right thing here, and guess wrong.
If factoring is 'broken', the world will focus more on elliptic-curve
cryptography and over more advanced methods.
===
Subject: Re: What is surrogate factoring? Once more.
No, not once more. Again and again, failing every time. You can't factor
anything.